I know it is difficult to discuss gun control legislation in the South, where the NRA reigns supreme and the mention of “gun control” is automatically linked with an attack on hunters’ rights.
But I think Jim Craig made an excellent point on gun control in light of the DC shootings and Justice Scalia’s recent opinion on DC gun laws:
How about a movement to amend the Constitution to explicitly provide for control of non-hunting, non-pistol weapons? Let’s have an open debate with those who think there’s an inalienable right to own semi-automatic firearms or armor-piercing bullets.
Now that’s a debate I’d like to see. And I bet law enforcement agencies would welcome it too.





