<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Versus Safari 3.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://samrhall.com/2008/03/firefox-3-versus-safari-31/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://samrhall.com/2008/03/firefox-3-versus-safari-31/</link>
	<description>This &#38; That — From Here &#38; There</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:24:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Link Love for Sunday, May 4, 2008 : Sam R. Hall</title>
		<link>http://samrhall.com/2008/03/firefox-3-versus-safari-31/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Love for Sunday, May 4, 2008 : Sam R. Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 03:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samrhall.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-versus-safari-31/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] to know. I&#8217;ve tested FF3. Gone back to Safari. But I really hated not having the del.icio.us [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to know. I&#8217;ve tested FF3. Gone back to Safari. But I really hated not having the del.icio.us [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam R. Hall</title>
		<link>http://samrhall.com/2008/03/firefox-3-versus-safari-31/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam R. Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samrhall.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-versus-safari-31/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Carl: You should go ahead and try FF3b, then. Since b2, I used it as my predominant browser. I had no issues with stability.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One of the things that kept me wanting to go back was its new design. So, I suspect that you will enjoy it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just had too many other issues that would not work for me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Carl: You should go ahead and try FF3b, then. Since b2, I used it as my predominant browser. I had no issues with stability.</p>

<p>One of the things that kept me wanting to go back was its new design. So, I suspect that you will enjoy it.</p>

<p>I just had too many other issues that would not work for me.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Sanford</title>
		<link>http://samrhall.com/2008/03/firefox-3-versus-safari-31/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Sanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samrhall.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-versus-safari-31/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I love safari, its just that I bet you at least once a day I come across a website that it can&#039;t read.  So I have to end up opening firefox (which is very inconvenient).  Safari also has trouble saving passwords on some websites that Firefox has no problems with.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I haven&#039;t played with the beta for Firefox, but if it could get to be as visually pleasing as Safari, I would jump off the Safari ship.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love safari, its just that I bet you at least once a day I come across a website that it can&#8217;t read.  So I have to end up opening firefox (which is very inconvenient).  Safari also has trouble saving passwords on some websites that Firefox has no problems with.</p>

<p>I haven&#8217;t played with the beta for Firefox, but if it could get to be as visually pleasing as Safari, I would jump off the Safari ship.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javed Sahadat</title>
		<link>http://samrhall.com/2008/03/firefox-3-versus-safari-31/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Javed Sahadat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samrhall.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-versus-safari-31/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Safari all the way!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari all the way!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And the winner is&#8230; Safari. : Sam R. Hall</title>
		<link>http://samrhall.com/2008/03/firefox-3-versus-safari-31/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>And the winner is&#8230; Safari. : Sam R. Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samrhall.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-versus-safari-31/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] For more than a month now, I’ve been testing Firefox 3 in various beta forms. It was the first version of the popular browser that really kept me coming back for more. As I said previously, usually my tests with Firefox ended in frustration. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For more than a month now, I’ve been testing Firefox 3 in various beta forms. It was the first version of the popular browser that really kept me coming back for more. As I said previously, usually my tests with Firefox ended in frustration. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
